Parker Charlotte

[karimamarika654]

The most optimistic come to believe in the possible "maturity" announced by those who will never leave aside the most rigorous sharia since it is its irrevocable foundation; They are those who see it as possible that international pressure, even the collection of signatures for any reason, will make them reflect... At the opposite extreme, the most pessimistic, very realistic, some with experience on the ground, who do not believe the word of the Taliban, since they know about their lies from before and believe that today they continue to lie, and that they will only change apparently out of interest. Debates now arise due to the withdrawal (or flight?) of US forces, dragging the troops of their allies into their work. Debates that would not occur without such an issue and even more so, without the chaos of Kabul. Without everything that has happened recently, Afghanistan would continue to remain in the limbo of ignorance; limbo in the conviction that all the objectives set, except for some specific contradictory event (generally violent) or for the complaint, not heard from some media, were progressing in their official fulfillment. Western " ostrichism " appears very evident today.

Current debates on which, for the moment, certain specific circumstances exert constant pressure (in turn the origin of specific debates as open questions), mixing some known from old with others that have arisen: The situation of women and girls. The migrations that have already begun. How to extract the collaborators who were left there. The path begun BTC Users Number Data towards a humanitarian crisis. How to get reliable information from within. To negotiate or not to negotiate with the future Taliban Government. Recognize or not recognize such Government. Presence or not of violent jihadism in its territory (Al Qaeda and the Islamic State). Geopolitical attitudes towards the situation (surrounding countries and interested powers). And more that we will surely discover… Debates, national and international, in which, apart from those who appreciate that everything was done well and that even the withdrawal, as far as possible, was perfect, a success, it seems that some want to impose themselves on others, especially in the political context, when here it is no longer about winning or losing but about learning. And now that? Can what has not been acted upon, or what has been acted upon with errors, be corrected over twenty years.



Few dedicate themselves to rethinking clearly, without outside influences, what has really happened, or better, what has been done wrong, where the error or errors made are, looking for solutions to learn, from the experience gained. , not to commit them again. But what specifically to rethink? There are already voices, that come from afar, that state that, in the type of actions against jihadist terrorism or similar violence, it is not of much use in the long term to act only on the military front , lacking or developing little of the structural front and nothing on the ideological front. Fronts that should always be present, complementing each other in coordinated action, in unity of action, by all the actors involved, without the presence of "false gods" who, with their interests, commit us to a wrong path. And then another debate begins that is very much against the recently expressed idea of ​​the US that its presence in Afghanistan was not to build a country but to defeat terrorism ; a terrorism that has not been curbed after so many years and that continues to grow in other countries in which the militarist solution has been and still is applied above all others.
_________________
BTC Users Number Data

[Reklama]